Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Lilian Poling vs Yolande Leacock Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Poling vs Leacock analysis and find out who is favored!
Lilian Poling vs Yolande Leacock Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Poling 1 - 0 Leacock
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Poling has won 42.6% of points on their second serve, while Leacock has won 35.87%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Poling, in recent form, has won 56.63% of their opponent's second serve points, while Leacock has won 53.85%. The same stats for first serve returns are 43.05% and 32.8% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Poling has saved 52.81% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Leacock has saved 36.73% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Poling has won 58.62% of matches played (W/L 17/ 12), with Leacock winning 41.67% (W/L 5/ 7) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Poling has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 55% (W/L 18/ 15), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 7/ 7). Leacock has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 43% (W/L 54/ 73), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 5).
- Player level: In the last year, Poling has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 59.09% of matches (W/L 13/ 9), where as Leacock has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 28.57% of matches (W/L 2/ 5). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Poling winning 1 times and Leacock being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Poling winning 2 and Leacock winning 0. The last match between Poling and Leacock was at the W35 Santo Domingo, 26-05-2024, Q1 round, Hard with Lilian Poling getting the victory 6-3 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Poling and Leacock have played a deciding set 0 times, with Poling winning 0 times and Leacock 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Poling winning 0, and Leacock 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Poling has played against opponents with an average rank of 58.1 while Leacock has played against players with an average rank of 14.33.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Poling has won 83% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Leacock has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Poling has converted 46.2% of breakpoint opportunities, and Leacock has converted 53.33% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
N/A
Rank
High
26
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
33
Age
Plays
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
Form
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
W
W
L
53% (27-24)
Career Total W/L
40% (71-108)
55% (11-9)
YTD W/L
42% (5-7)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Lilian Poling vs Yolande Leacock For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Poling VS Leacock
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Lilian Poling | Yolande Leacock |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 6 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-3 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Lilian Poling | Yolande Leacock |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 55% (11/9) | 42% (5/7) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 52% (23/21) | 42% (11/15) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (212/206) | 44% (96/123) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 60% (3/2) | 45% (5/6) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 55% (6/5) | 0% (0/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.03 | 0.02 |
| Aces Total | 7 | 2 |
| DFs per game | 0.33 | 0.09 |
| DFs Total | 67 | 10 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:35:57 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 84.25 | 14.33 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (772/1218) | 69% (209/301) |
| 1st Serve W% | 56% (432/772) | 50% (104/209) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 43% (190/446) | 36% (33/92) |
| BPs Won% Total | 46% (79/171) | 53% (16/30) |
| Return Pts W% | 47% (610/1286) | 40% (111/280) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 54% (7/6) | 29% (2/5) |
| Futures W/L | 57% (4/3) | 60% (3/2) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 55% (11/20) | 42% (5/12) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 40% (2/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 75% (3/4) | 50% (1/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (10/10) | 100% (4/4) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (10/0) | 0% (4/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 10% (10/1) | 13% (8/1) |
Lilian Poling Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats 
Maribella Zamarripa
Player
Lilian Poling
70%
(
46 of
66)
1st Serve %
73%
(
30 of
41)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
42%
(
28 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lian Tran
Player
Lilian Poling
75%
(
49 of
65)
1st Serve %
52%
(
30 of
58)
0
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
4
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
31%
(
5 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
6 of
28)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
43%
(
28 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
72
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lilian Poling
Player
Maria Castano
62%
(
72 of
116)
1st Serve %
59%
(
67 of
113)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
15
56%
(
40 of
72)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
37 of
67)
50%
(
22 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
19 of
46)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
47%
(
54 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
57 of
113)
119
Total Points Won
110
|
6-7(4) 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lilian Poling
Player
Oziera Ahmad
63%
(
43 of
68)
1st Serve %
73%
(
54 of
74)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
25 of
54)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
46%
(
31 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
39 of
74)
76
Total Points Won
66
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Angella Okutoyi
Player
Lilian Poling
62%
(
42 of
68)
1st Serve %
72%
(
47 of
65)
1
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
1
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
31%
(
8 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
47%
(
32 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
71
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lilian Poling
Player
Mia Yamakita
76%
(
75 of
99)
1st Serve %
63%
(
65 of
104)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
3
61%
(
46 of
75)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
39 of
65)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
40%
(
40 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
46 of
104)
105
Total Points Won
98
|
7-6(1) 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lilian Poling
Player
Elizabeth Danailova
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve %
66%
(
33 of
50)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
39%
(
26 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kayla Cross
Player
Lilian Poling
62%
(
50 of
81)
1st Serve %
60%
(
43 of
72)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
2
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
44%
(
36 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
41 of
72)
86
Total Points Won
67
|
6-3 3-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Yolande Leacock Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Kolie Allen
Player
Yolande Leacock
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve %
47%
(
16 of
34)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
90%
(
18 of
20)
1st Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
17%
(
5 of
30)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
49
Total Points Won
15
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yolande Leacock
Player
Carolina Isabel Chiatti Reynoso
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve %
59%
(
26 of
44)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
71%
(
5 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
11 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
54
Total Points Won
27
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF | 3-6 6-3 10-6 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 4-6 10-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Jenna Dean
Player
Yolande Leacock
56%
(
18 of
32)
1st Serve %
68%
(
28 of
41)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
72%
(
13 of
18)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
10 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
45
Total Points Won
28
|
6-3 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 7-5 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Robin Anderson
Player
Yolande Leacock
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve %
64%
(
25 of
39)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
4
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
12 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
55
Total Points Won
24
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jaeda Daniel
Player
Yolande Leacock
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve %
61%
(
27 of
44)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
12 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
55
Total Points Won
28
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Poling Vs Leacock Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Poling are available here and Leacock photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
